Rehabilitating Introspection (pdf-10 pp)
A Procedure for a First Person Psychical Science
Abstract: In this paper I argue that the lack of progress in
developing a science of the mind is not because a mind can not be
objectively observed, but rather because human minds are highly
individualized. I then propose a procedure for addressing this
individualization problem and offer a number of insights based on
what are presumed to be intersubjectively reproducible features
of my own mind.
Feelings of Worthlessness (pdf-10 pp)
An Annotated Outline of a Theory of Emotional Instability
Abstract: In this paper I outline a theory of ego/ self-worth
related emotion based on the premise that 'feelings of worthlessness'
are a maladaptive byproduct of the evolution of rationality.
Rationology 101 (pdf-9 pp)
Abstract: It is often taken as a given that rationality is
a matter of adjudicating means to ends (e.g., Hume). Based
on the premise that 'feelings of worthlessness' are a maladaptive
byproduct of the evolution of rationality, I forego this convention
by proposing a theory of rationality that encompasses the rationality
of ends. One of the more interesting implications of this approach
is that the moral maxim, 'love (intrinsically value) your neighbor
as yourself' can be construed as an imperative of an implicit theory
of rationality in which 'being rational' is simply a matter of
'being objective', not only cognitively, but valuatively as well
(impartiality). Furthermore, by demonstrating how this implicit
theory can address
various rationality paradoxes (rational irrationality, epistemic vs.
practical rationality conflict, the "rationality debate" [Cohen
vs. Tversky and Kahneman], the Prisoners' Dilemma, etc.), its
epistemic credentials can be shown to surpass those of competing
theories such as the means/end theory, rational choice theory,
egoism, utilitarianism, the "standard picture", etc. In the final
section of the paper I employ some of these insights to derive a
moral 'ought' from an epistemic 'is'.
Why We Turned Out Like Captain Kirk
(Instead of Mr. Spock)
(pdf-10 pp)
The Psychodynamics of Genetic Indeterminism
Abstract: Based on Hume's observations on how association
"facilitates the sympathy", I offer an alternative to the various
adaptionist accounts of human benevolence (kin selection,
reciprocal altruism, group selection, etc.) in a natural world
presumed to favor selfishness. In this scenario, the cumulative effect of Hume's logic over millennia of linguistic and cultural
evolution has
become sufficient to have overwhelmed nature's incessant culling of
the valuatively unfit (benevolent individuals). Although less than
optimal, the resulting valuative profile has been "tolerated" by
natural selection as a necessary premium for reaping the adaptive
rewards that attend a rational species. Paradoxically, this
would also entail the intriguing implication we have become less
determined (conatively/ valuatively) by natural selection as a
result of natural selection.
Being Rational (pdf-12 pp)
Abstract: Based on a simple premise and relying on
the metaphor of vision, I offer an alternative to the
"standard picture" of rationality in which 'being rational'
is construed as simply a matter of conforming to established
rules of inference. In addition to offering a means of
visualizing a number of features commonly associated with
rationality including correspondence, coherence,
incompleteness, justification and irrationality, I also
explain how my alternative to the "standard picture" can
provide solutions to the Gettier problem, the "rationality
debate" (Stein) and "the central theoretical problem of
sociobiology" (Wilson).
Dismantling the Guillotine (pdf-10 pp)
Abstract: Aside from the mind body problem, there
is perhaps no more infamous philosophical perplexity than
'Hume's Guillotine', i.e., the purported logical gap between
'is' (factual/ descriptive) premises and 'ought'
(normative/ prescriptive) conclusions. Based on the premise
that our prescriptive 'ought's are actually referencing a
shared implicit (e.g., subconscious) theory of rationality
and my own proposed procedure for deciphering some of its
parameters, I offer a derivation of a moral prescriptive
'ought' ('love thy neighbor') from a descriptive 'is' (an
implicit theory of rationality that is demonstrably "true")
on the grounds that the concept/ attribute of rationality is
the fount from which practical normativity flows. I also
offer an explanation for why we, as quasi rational naturally
selected organisms, experience and often respond to the
tug of this moral maxim ('love thy neighbor'), including
those occasions that fall wildly outside of the parameters
predicted by inclusive fitness theory (Mother Teresa,
self-endangering Greenpeacers, self-incinerating Buddhist
monks, etc.).